The most recently conflict
I had experienced was on my job just before going on a two week vacation. After
putting in a leave request back in August 2014 for three weeks in order to take
care of a family matter. The conflict took place right before my vacation was supposed
to start in February 2015, when I was deny the full leave request. Not only
from one supervisor, but two of them gave me assurance that it will be no
problem when the time came for my vacation, because I put the request in well
in advance. That was not the case because when the time came for me to take my
vacation there is a problem. My supervisor waited up until it was time for me
to get off work when she said “I cannot give you three weeks of vacation
instead I can only give you two week”. My first response was why? She just
looked at me with a sad face for a moment. Then she replied by saying “I don’t
believe people take more than 2 week vacation and because of the time of the
year it was. Which I feel was not a solid reason for denying my full vacation. All
I know it was not fair to me, because what does it matter what time of the year
it was and I have been working at this job long enough to witness other colleagues
taking off for a month for a vacation. I even reminded her of the verbal
agreement that was giving to me by her and the other supervisor. Her reply was
I understand that but I did not realize I put in for three weeks.
In frustration all I could
really say was “this is not fair to me at all”. My supervisor only response was
I am sorry. Just as I finished my conversation with the supervisor one of my
colleagues said aloud to her “I need two days of the week of February 9th”;
which was the week I supposed to be on vacation. Not only was my colleague’s leave
request granted, but another colleagues who just got back from a six week vacation
was granted the other three days in that week. Of course, I was hurt and felt
what my supervisor did to me was not right. After telling my supervisor how wrong
I felt it was to take a week of vacation away from me in an angry way. I apologize
the next day. Of course, she accept my apology, but I came up with the short
end of the stick.
I believe if this vacation
was not important to me, I would have not got angry but it would have been
easier for me to accept her decision. After waiting to deny my vacation just two
before it was supposed to start is not right. There was no type of reasoning or
trying to compromise the situation. I believe the supervisor should have told
me weeks ago about her decision, discuss a different plan with me instead of
granting the days I ask for to other colleagues or suggested to give me other
available days to make up the week she took from me.
I believe if things are
not probably dealt with in a timely manner then it is impossible to resolve any
disagreement or conflict between the two parties. Providing a quick answer or
using escapist strategies is not always the better way. The principles of NVC
might positively impact communication in ways that provides opportunity where
people can come together on one accord or in unity. Just to sit down together,
discussing the issue at hand and coming up with a realistic solution that would
have beneficial for all parties can be good. The two strategies I would like to
share is not to come to resolve a conflict without using a solutions that is
beneficial for everyone. In other words
it is important to solve conflicts with using a cooperative strategies. Also it
is important to address the matter with the truth and not give any reason or
opinion. In other words by using the conflict management strategies allows all
parties to address disagreements professionally and sensibly as possible.
Reference:
O’Hair, D., & Wiemann, M. (2012). Real
communication: Am introduction. New York:
Bed
ford/St. Martin’s